IDEA to live stream Belgrade Open 2011!

The Belgrade Open is one of the biggest events in the debating calendar of the Central and Eastern European region. The Open attracts media attention, as its debates are open to the general public and its Grand Final and Closing Ceremony are held at the National Parliament building.

This year, starting February 25th, IDEA will live stream the Belgrade Open 2011!

The event includes more than 60 teams from a number of countries of the surrounding region and from afar - including, but not limited to - teams from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, England, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey.

The IDEA media team, in cooperation with the organizers of the Belgrade Open, shall provide live coverage of the event, via video, still photographs as well as live updates of scores, tabs and happenings via the social networks.

You can watch the debates live at:

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bg-open

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bg-open1

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bg-open2

DEA to live stream Belgrade Open 2011!

The Belgrade Open is one of the biggest events in the debating calendar of the Central and Eastern European region. The Open attracts media attention, as its debates are open to the general public and its Grand Final and Closing Ceremony are held at the National Parliament building.

This year, starting February 25th, IDEA will live stream the Belgrade Open 2011!

The event includes more than 60 teams from a number of countries of the surrounding region and from afar - including, but not limited to - teams from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, England, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey.

The IDEA media team, in cooperation with the organizers of the Belgrade Open, shall provide live coverage of the event, via video, still photographs as well as live updates of scores, tabs and happenings via the social networks.

You can watch the debates live at:

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bg-open

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bg-open1

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bg-open2

Knight News Challenge media innovation contest

If you have an innovative media technology idea, you might be able to get funding from the Knight News Challenge contest.

Run by the Knight Foundation, the grant competition awards up to $5 million annually for innovative projects that use digital technology to transform the way communities send, receive and make use of news and information.

More info can be found here: http://newschallenge.org. The site includes application information, as well as details about past winners.

This year's application deadline is December 1. The News Challenge is looking for applications in four categories: mobile, authenticity, sustainability and community.  All projects must make use of digital technology to distribute news in the public interest.

The contest is open to anyone in the world.

A simple description of the project is all you need to apply. Submit a brief pitch to http://newschallenge.org. If the reviewers like it, you'll be asked to submit a full proposal later.

If you have questions you can a) reference the FAQ: http://www.newschallenge.org/frequently-asked-questions, or; b) check the archived chat transcript here: http://www.newschallenge.org/1026-live (another live chat will be held before the end of the contest period, time/date TBD)

You can follow Knight Foundation at http://twitter.com/knightfdn. The News Challenge Twitter hashtag is #knc

Macau NEAO 2010 Result!

University of Macau proudly hosted Northeast Asian Debate Open 2010 from 29th October to 1st November, thanks everyone for your participation! Wish you enjoyed the debate, the halloween part, the egg tarts and the portuguese food.
Hope to see you all again in UADC next year.
 
Here is the result and the attached are teams and speakers' standing.
 

Winner: Underwood 1  (Nurliana Kamaruddin & Wonjoon Jang)

 

Best Speaker in the final: Nurliana Kamaruddin

 

Runners-up :

Hanyang 3 (Dong Kyu Lim & Geon Sub Shin),

KU 2(Junbin Yun & Moonyeol Lee),

EDIS 1 (Heejin An & Hannah Jung)

 

 

Semi-Finalists:

KU 1    (Junbin Yun & Moonyeol lee)

HKU 1 (Amanda Slocum    & Alfred, Siu Hong Yu)

TFSU 1(Wan Qing He & Yu Ma)

UM 1( Emmanuel & Song Wei Xian)

 

Quarter-Finalists:

PKU 1 (Shiyi Dong & Bao Jia Tan)

Hanyang 1 (Soo Jin Park & Cho Sung Hyun)

IPM 1 (Cici, Liu Si Si & Alex, Geng Chao)

NEUQ 1 (Xu Shengyu & Ma Jing)

TOKYO 2(Akira Kato & Takashi Iwai)

CITYU 1 (Ken, Kin Hang Li & Jacky, Hon Cheung Lam)

ICU 1 (Keita Takayanagi & Hiroyuki Ikeda)

CAU 1 (Kim NamChul & Ki Wook Kim)

 

EFL Winner: NUDT 1 (Deng Yiqi & Qu Jingwen)

 

EFL Runners-up:

KYOTO 1 (Zhang Haichong & Takimoto Riko)

TOKYO 3                (Toshinari Ishikawa & Kazushige Yoshimaru)

ICU 2 (Taichi Kohatsu & Miyuki Orito)

 
10 Top best speakers:
1.Nurliana Kamaruddin
2.Wonjoon Jang
3.Heejin An
4.Hannah Jung
5.Junbin Yun
6.Moonyeol Lee
-Keita Takayanagi
8.Minkyung cho
9.Hyewon Rho
10.Bao Jia Tan
 
Motions:

R1: THBT parents whose children are grossly obese should be penalized for child abuse.

R2: THBT China should support United Nation sanctions on North Korea.

R3: THBT energy companies of developed countries operating in developing countries should adhere to the environmental standards of their countries of origin.

R4: THBT EU should sanction its members for denying practice of religious freedom in public.

R5: THW ban beneficiaries of public welfare from entering casinos.

EFL Semi: THW allow the Taliban to join the elections as a legitimate party.

EFL Final: THBT Nobel Peace Prize should only be awarded in recognition of individuals who have already brought peace.

Quarter-Final: THBT African Union should monitor and be responsible for the security in Somalian waters.

Semi-Final: THW shut down websites of political bloggers that spread lies.

Grand-Final: THBT drug addicts should only be eligible for social welfare under condition of rehabilitation.


---
Source:
Nicole Ng
Chief Adjudicator
Northeast Asian Open 2010

Click here to download:
Team Standings.pdf (92 KB)
(download)

Click here to download:
Speakers Standings.pdf (117 KB)
(download)

The Big IDEA -Sign Up - Global Debates

 
 
In this issue...
  • Competition - Debate online now!
  •  
    “Debaters taking on distinguished economists, popping up on TV and radio, organising social action, competing in global tournaments. It's all here - plus opportunities to sign up for competitions, wherever you are.
      Neill Harvey-Smith, editor, The Big IDEA.
    Competition - Debate online now 
    November 16th is the UN's International Day of Tolerance. Tolerance is a tricky concept, easier to support than to define, so here's a debate to test you out:
     Competition - You're The Judge
    No winner this week, though thanks for your entries. More homework needed!
    Q4 was: In a British Parliamentary debate, the Opposition Whip speaks for seven minutes without taking a point of information. It is a brilliant speech, and one of your fellow judges think the closing opposition team have clearly won. But the other panellist thinks failure to take a POI merits an automatic fourth place. You're the judge – what do you do?
     
    The answer: there is no such thing as an automatic fourth place. No one flaw or attribute puts you in a position by default. The judges should take into account the failure to take a point of information as part of their overall impression. They should make a call about how important it was in that particular debate. If the speaker was running away from a case or argument to which they had no answer, then it is serious. If they made a simple timing error, it is less serious.
    Q5: You are judging a room which includes a swing team, or dummy team, comprising students from the host institution. The panel agrees that they are the best team in the room – but your colleagues claim that swing teams must be put fourth, to avoid distorting the break. Are they right? You're the judge!
     
    Sign Up - Global Debates
    The Global Debates: 36 days gone - 40 days to go!
    15 days to submit your essay for the IDEA Global Challenge! Great rewards for joining in!
    Submit an essay summarizing the best arguments and evidence you gathered for your public debate on the topic: Nations of the world should increase protection of the economic and social rights of migrants.
    Your essay should present your team’s best arguments for the proposition, the team arguing in favor of the resolution. Aim for 3-5 double-spaced pages. And don't forget to send it to us by November 15!
    The prize winning essays will be featured in the next issue of Idebate Magazine and posted on
    idebate.org
    and The Global Debates website. The top 10 entries will earn 500 bonus points for the Global Debates. Above all the top two Global Debate Challenge Fall 2010 Campaign entries will win 50% fee waiver for the 2011 IDEA Youth Forum, which takes place from July 19-August 1, 2011 in Istanbul, Turkey. Submit your best work and aim for the top prizes!
     
    Stories and Updates
    Rebecca Kuhn and her team from Bugil Academy (Korea) played the PlayDecide migration game. Along with her friends, they agreed on adopting the policy no. 3, with the following addendum: Nations must accept immigrants with refugee status defined by the UN. Individual nations could decide further to accept immigrants undefined by the UN such as climate refugees.
    Kristen Dupard from Ridgeland High School (USA) submitted her Research Blog on how Ugandan internally displaced persons are recovering from the aftermath of the war between the Ugandan government and the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA). There is a huge number of migrants in the world, in the United States alone there are 33.1 million immigrants, legal and illegal, that seek the “American Dream.” This is the opening sentence of Migrant Action plan submitted by the students from The Grover Cleveland High School (USA). They are in the game for the above mentioned prizes. Are you?
     
    Our partners help us spread the word. 
    Help us spread the word and become a partner too!
     
    Sign Up - The HWS/IDEA Round Robin
    On April 8th and 9th, 2010, an elite and internationally diverse group of university debaters will descend on Geneva, New York for the annual Round Robin.
    You can join them – for a weekend of high-quality debate with exceptional adjudicators and fabulous hospitality, including dinner with Mark Gearan (Peace Corps Director) and Tony Lake (UNICEF director), and an awards banquet at The Cobblestone.
    The automatic qualifiers include the four WUDC grand finalists, winners of the Asian BP Champs, Australs, CUSID BP Nats, Europeans, Hart House IV, International Mace, Oxford IV, Pan-African Champs, Sydney Mini, United Asians, US UDC and the Yale IV.
    You can apply to be there too. Contact Eric Barnes and check out the website. Applications will be assessed between now and January 31st.
    I thoroughly recommend this tournament. You will have a great time.
     
    Sign Up - PAUDC
    Last chance to join in all the fun at the Pan-African Universities Debating Championships in Namibia. The final deadline for late registration is November 19th. Institutions who have not yet registered, or those who want to enter additional teams, still have a chance to do so. Hurry though – places are limited.
    Contact Carl Pesat for assistance.
     
    News - IDEA Youth Forum 2011
    We are happy to welcome Hanneke Westerhout (Netherlands) - IDEA's newest employee. Some of you might recognize her from the IDEA Youth Forum 2010 in Zeeland, where she was responsible for the logistics of the event, taking care of the evening program, venues, transportation, communication and general participant care.
    All this experience will help Hanneke to make sure the 2011 YF runs smoothly, as she guides our host, Doga Colleges. She will be communicating with the general public and participants. Veronika will remain in charge of the curriculum and trainers preparation and will help Hanneke with the transition.
    We are also proud to announce that the official 2011 IDEA Youth Forum website is online! This website features important information on the Youth Forum and will be updated regularly with the latest news about the program, the venues, the host, and the topic of international migration.
    Last of all we are excited to announce the call for 2011 IDEA Youth Forum trainers. The Curriculum Committee will be selecting 21 trainers who will be asked to give training in Karl Popper and British parliamentary style and judge during the 2011 IDEA Youth Forum. The Committee will employ multiple criteria for selecting the pool of trainers for the YF including debate and teaching excellence, concern for geographic and programmatic diversity, the desire to develop the capacity of young trainers and the motivation for participating as trainer.
    Please email Veronika for more information. The deadline for submitting your applications is December 20, 2010.
    For more information go to: www.idebate.org/ideaforum or contact Hanneke.
    The 2011 IDEA Youth Forum, is a two-week summer debate event for high school students and their coaches, which will take place from July 19 to August 1, 2010 in Istanbul, Turkey. The event is co-organized by IDEA and Doga Colleges.
     
    News - Serbian school parliaments
    On October 30th, 30 high school parliament representatives from across Serbia met in Belgrade. They decided to hold actions in 15 Serbian towns from December 6-10, organizing exhibitions, concerts and performances. Their aim is to promote youth activism in their local communities as well as to empower a network of youth leaders representing majority and minority, rural and urban populations.
     In Backi Petrovac, where the Slovak minority is predominant, a seminar for 30 members of high school parliaments was held to develop leadership skills, to build the capacity of students to articulate their ideas, to critically examine issues affecting their communities and to practice tolerance for different viewpoints.
     The Conference of the network of Serbian high school parliaments is scheduled for December 11. At the conference students will share success stories and brainstorm ideas for future co-operation between schools.
     
    News - Estonia v Economists
    A public debate took place on Wednesday, October 27 in the run-up to Estonia's accession to the euro area on January 1, 2011. It was resolved that "Euro accession will accelerate economic growth in Estonia".
    Monetary policy heavyweights on the government side - vice-president of the Bank of Estonia, Märten Ross, and a publicly well-known macroeconomic analyst and commentator from SEB bank, Hardo Pajula – took on an opposition comprising debaters Martin Küüsmaa, Oxford IV ESL semi-finalist from 2007 and Silver Suun, WUDC ESL semi-finalist from 2009.
    The debate was rich in content and generated a lot of media attention - both major daily papers as well as the national broadcaster ran stories and it was featured on the evening news programme” said Margo Loor, head of the Estonian Debating Society. “As before, we ran a blog of the debate on the website of Postimees, the leading daily. Also, we took real-time questions from online readers and asked them from the debaters, posting answers back online.”
    Links to stories, videos and photos can be found on the Facebook page.

    News - Human Rights in Uganda
    Alongside their groundbreaking prison debate, the debaters of Bishop Cipriano Kihangire Senior Secondary School in Kampala, Uganda, have carried out a number of activities so far to meet the global debate challenge 2010.
    Since the launch on 9th October, pupils have carried out a range of service projects aimed at creating awareness on the economic and social rights of migrants. On Saturday 23rd October, they were hosted on 107.3 Radio Maria FM on an Educational programme for one hour, in which the topic of discussion was the fundamental rights and freedoms of migrants.
    On Sunday 24th-October, 2010, they were hosted for another one hour programme on 105.3 Family Radio FM. On "Your Teacher Programme", they deliberated on their migration plan focusing on Ugandan Economic Migrants in Southern Sudan. The two programmes attracted a lot of public interest and a number of listeners called into the discussion. In these two programmes, the students informed the public of the International migration day which falls on 8th December. They highlighted human rights instruments that promote and protect social and economic rights of migrants and other fundamental rights and freedoms.
     “Students are now working on the final touches of their migration plan” said Charles Drake Rubongoya, the school's Director of Studies. “It will be presented to the Minister of State for Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Hon. Freddie Ruhindi, before final submission”.
    Together in Europe Conference
     
    IDEA and participants of the Together in Europe Conference
    will be invited to the Rotterdam City Hall (Burgerzaal) for the official opening of the Conference on Thursday 18
    th November at 17.30.
     They will be welcomed by Mrs. Korrie Louwes, the Alderman of the City Council, who is the host of the evening.
     “We are looking forward to this great occasion” said Marcin Zaleski, Executive Director of IDEA, “particularly since the Municipality of Rotterdam and IDEA have been cooperating on implementing the Debate in the Neighborhood Program in different districts of Rotterdam”.
     Together in Europe Conference is becoming an exciting event – with many interesting workshops, presentations and sessions. You can find details of the presentations and sessions here.
     If you happen to be in Rotterdam on 19th or 20th of November – please feel free to join in!

    At Home in Europe report launch
     OSF At Home in Europe Project and IDEA will launch two reports prepared by OSF At Home in Europe Project:  Muslims in Rotterdam (19th of November - at the Together in Europe Conference ) and Muslims in Amsterdam (23rd

SMU BPIV's 2010 Important Announcements

On behalf of the SMU Debating Society, I have some important
announcements to make regarding the tournament this weekend.

They are as follows:

1) We are proud to officially announce our adjudication core which
consists of:

CA: Andrea Soriano (SMU)
DCA: Mark Cordiner (NUS)
DCA: Karthik Shankar (NTU)

Also, several of our alumni including Bhavya Khanna, Shrawan Saraogi
have also promised to come and adjudicate.

2) We are extending registration till tomorrow (Oct 14) midnight as we
have still not reached our tournament cap of 48 teams

3) Independent teams can participate in the tournament, but they will
not be allowed to break to the final rounds which include the semis
and the finals. This is a change from our earlier update in which we
announced that we are breaking independent teams. The reason for the
change is that we already had the SDO's last weekend in which all
independent teams got a chance to break and since this is an inter-
varsity tournament, independent teams by right shouldn't break.

Lastly, just a reminder to come to the following venue and time on
Saturday.

Venue: School of Economics & Social Sciences, Singapore Management
University, 90 Stamford Road
Date & Time: 16th October, 8:00 AM

The teams that have registered will also be officially receiving the
details after registration closes tomorrow.

---
Source
Anshul Agarwala
Vice President, Events
SMU Debating Society

IPPF deadline TODAY! Win trip to New York and $10 000




REGISTER FOR
THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY FORUM TODAY
AND WIN ALL EXPENSES TRIP TO NEW YORK
AND 10 000 USD !
 

What is the IPPF? The IPPF is the only contest that gives high school students across the globe the opportunity to participate in written and oral debates on issues of public policy - for free! 
 
Who can participate: high schools students around the world
 
Next deadlines:
October 13 to register 
Essays must be submitted by 2 p.m. CST on October 27
 
How to participate:
Teams register at www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf. After a team registers, it begins constructing a qualifying round essay on the topic, "Resolved: NATO military operations in Afghanistan are not justified." Essays can be written in either the affirmative or the negative, and must be no more than 2,800 words. Essays must be submitted to ippf@bickelbrewer.com by 2 p.m. CST on October 27. Each member of a team that submits an essay will receive 6 NFL points!

How will the essays be evaluated and what can you win:
At 2 p.m. CST on November 10, the top 32 teams will be announced at www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf. Those teams earn cash awards and advance into a single-elimination, written debate contest. Teams volley papers back and forth over the Internet, with judges reviewing the papers and voting for the winning teams. This process continues until the "Elite Eight" teams emerge. The "Elite Eight" earn all-expenses-paid trips to IPPF Finals Weekend in New York, where the champion takes home a $10,000 grand prize!

important links: at www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf

 
contact information:
AQB@bickelbrewer.com
Andrea Burnett
IPPF Program Coordinator



 
Submit news
Have news to share with the debate community? Send to: cphillip@idebate.org
or
 
For the latest IDEA news, visit and subscribe to our blog!
 
 
 
Connect!
IDEA on Twitter
IDEA on Facebook 
IDEA on Myspace 
 

---

Source: www.idebate.org

The Big IDEA - Online Debate Special

 
In this issue...
 “Worlds are over, but online debate continues to explode so I bring news and opportunities to get involved. Away from your laptop, no fewer than 5 events are inviting you to register. There are also all the usual opportunities to debate and share your know-how. Clear half an hour and scroll down...
 
  Neill Harvey-Smith, editor, The Big IDEA.

Competition - Debate online now
World Space Week. What better topic?
Space Settlement Should Be A Goal For Mankind.
Competition - You’re The Judge
We have a winner! Take a bow, Karl Lall, for giving a perfect answer to my question. Credit also to the runners-up, Lithembe Sebe, Abdul Somed Abdul Basit and Yuriy Gayevskiy.
The problem was: In a British Parliamentary debate, the first speaker of the closing government team is making her speech. She spends several minutes rebutting the opening opposition, then makes two new arguments to further the proposition. After the debate, a fellow adjudicator says you should penalise her for failing to make an extension. You are forced to admit that she did not use the word “extension”. On that basis, he wants to demote the team from first to second.
Karl says: “Debate should not be about using certain words - it should be about ideas and concepts. In a BP debate we value the fact, that the debate does not stand in one place but rather that new arguments are being brought to the table. If the second speaker of Gov 2 has presented two new arguments, then (s)he has fulfilled that role - the debate has been taken further on. The fact that (s)he did not use the words "extention" or "elaboration" or "my new material" or similar, is irrelevant and (s)he certainly does not deserve to be punished for not using a specific word, when (s)he has clearly done what we expect from a 1st speaker of Gov 2.”
Today's challenge is about online debating.
Q3: “In the first round of the World Online Debating Championships, your opponents write a very long and detailed case, linking to dozens of articles and using very difficult technical language that you don't understand. You feel out of your depth and worry that you are going to lose. Should you copy their style? Should you adopt their approach? Or should you do something different?
Answers please to nhsemail@gmail.com.
Results - WODC 2010
The 2010 WODC was won by the Czech Republic, who beat New Zealand 4-2 in the final. It was a tight debate on the motion that Social Housing Should Be Assigned In A Way Which Engineers Mixed Race Communities.
It was adjudicated by a top panel of judges including Rose Helens-Hart, Fred Cowell, Loke Wing Fatt, Andy Hume, Tommy Tonner and Anne Valkering.
Congratulations to both sets of finalists and everyone else who took part.
 
Feature - Online Debates in Romania
Are online debates a vehicle for quality debates, based on thorough research, conducive to a better understanding of important issues? Or are they sleek but superficial, better suited to a chat-room like discussion?In our experience, the first version is more plausible” says Bianca Dragomir of ARDOR.
ARDOR's Debate Academy  created a community of students using critical reading and knowledge-based debates as tools for civil involvement.
Alongside critical reading seminars on opinion articles from prestigious journals like The Economist and Newsweek, and public debates where students were paired up with Romanian public figures, the program featured online debates.
Dragomir sees great advantage in using the internet. “Online debates are accessible to students interested in debate from all over the country, regardless of their location. It is an obvious medium for people who are used to spending hours online every day. No less importantly, it is cheaper to organize and to administrate than live debates”.
“Online debates are less spontaneous than the offline ones, but they are also more structured, more analytical and better researched, all due to the fact that students have more time to create and evaluate arguments, to dig for better examples and data.”
Style is evaluated and graded, just as it would be in a live debate. Yet in Romania, there is no creative writing in high schools. Online debates give students a unique opportunity to hone their writing skills.
“Students become more aware and responsible regarding the way they use quotations and sources.” notes Dragomir. “Oral debate sometimes gives room for modified quotations or data. This is less likely to occur online, where everything you mention as proof/quote/example is just a one click distance from the judge and the public.”
Now they are ready to do it all again, on a greater scale! Four Romanian cities and centers of higher education – Cluj, Ia?i, Bucure?ti and Timi?oara – will join to discuss the topic they will have voted as their favorite. This exercise will give an overview on how young people understand issues such as migration, ethnic and racial minorities, public/private education, the Romanian health system, depending on their geographic location and cultural differences.
News - Debating in Class: Lithuania
The Public Institution Educational Debate Centre, Lithuania has secured a €259,124 grant from the Agency of European Social Funds for a two year project: “
Integrating Debate Methodology into the Formal Education System".
The project will be implemented together with no fewer than 32 partners – 18 schools, 12 Teacher training centres and 2 Youth NGOs. The main activities include two Conferences, 26 teacher training seminars/workshops, 60 public debates, 20 Forum debates, three two-day national debate tournaments, the publication of a Handbook for class teachers (2000 copies), and 2574 lessons held in 6 school subjects with debate methodology integrated into classes.
The rest of the world will be watching! What a fabulous opportunity to demonstrate the value of debate.
News - IDEA debate, Arnhem
 
 
Everybody knows the story: young people who drop out, become excluded and put on the margins of society. But what can we do about it? What inclusion policies can work? What can decision makers and communities do together to address the problems of marginalized youth? Are fines for “anti-social behavior” the only solutions now? 
 
 On the weekend of 15-17th October, 75 young people from Amsterdam, Rotterdam and the Province of Zeeland will debate these questions and speak about them from their own personal experience. And - perhaps - they will come up with good and creative solutions. It will end with a public debate on strategies and approaches needed to address the problems of disadvantaged youth. The debate will involve Ms Tanja Jadnanansingh, a Dutch MP, as one of the speakers.
  
The exciting weekend of debating – featuring workshops, skills development sessions, and debates - is the culmination of an 8-month project implemented by IDEA in the Netherlands, made possible thanks to a generous grant from the European Commission under Youth in Action Program (Dutch National Agency). The purpose of the project was to engage young people from disadvantaged backgrounds in preparation for and organization of public debates.
 
 Six debates have been organized  - involving young people, members of  national and local policy makers in the Netherlands. The main theme of the 6 debates was the European Year of Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion and young people participating in the projects have had an opportunity to share their views and opinions with young people from other communities and background, and then with decision makers. Topics of debates have included: migration, inclusion of minorities, unemployment and effects of the economic slow-down on young people, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
 
 The Big IDEA wishes you all a great weekend and we look forward to learning the results.

News - IDEA: Staying Young in Zeeland
 

The Big IDEA - special edition - Global Debates!

 
 
In this issue...Global Debates!
 “An extra Big IDEA entirely devoted to the fantastic Global Debates program, showing you how to get involved, detailing the €40,000 worth of prizes and bulging with ideas to kick off the programme.
 
Should nations of the world increase protection of the economic and social rights of migrants...? You decide!
 
  Neill Harvey-Smith, editor, The Big IDEA.
 
What are the Global Debates?
Global Debates are a worldwide contest of debating and public service events. International Debate Education Association (IDEA) invites all secondary school students (age 14-19) to participate, on the theme of international migration.
 
The topic for debates is:
Nations of the world should increase protection of the economic and social rights of migrants. 
 
To take part in the Contest, schools need to register on the Global Debates Website.
  
They will then conduct a range of activities during the two Global Debates Campaigns: October – December 2010 and February– April 2011.
 
In addition to organizing public debates, schools can submit essays, photos, videos and organize public service events. Each activity organized by a school will be awarded points. The schools which collect the highest number of points will win amazing prizes – including a trip (with a teacher who can judge) to the IDEA International Debate Forum in Istanbul, Turkey, in July- August 2011.
 
For further details on school registration, activities and how to organize them, visit our website or contact the Global Debates Team.

Why enter?

The project offers a unique opportunity to develop life skills and participate in an international activity which matters and make change happen. People who get engaged and involved in issues are more successful in getting to college and pursuing the careers of their choice. Participating in this project will put you and your school on the map worldwide.

Not only will this initiative help you understand the issues underlying international migration, but you will be able to impact on the life of your community. Are you fed up listening to people in charge talk about what is best for you and people around you? Design your own plan, debate it with others, make it happen and let everyone know about it!

You can learn more about the problems you and people around you face and help find solutions to these problems. By debating them, organizing events to address them and informing others about these issues, you will learn how to present yourself, argue for what you believe in and how to work in a group to advocate change. These are skills that you will need in your future career, no matter what you end up doing.

The €40,000 prize fund

Win one of following the prizes

  • The top 100 teams in the Global Debates Fall 2010 Campaign get a book of their choice from the Idebate press.

  • The top 100 teams in the Global Debates Spring 2011 Campaign get a book of their choice from the Idebate press.

  • The top two Global Debate Challenge Fall 2010 Campaign entries will win a 50% fee waiver for the 2011 IDEA Youth Forum (July 19-August 1, 2011) in Istanbul.*

  • The top two teams (one international and one US) from the Global Debates Fall 2010 Campaign get a 50% fee waiver to the 2011 IDEA Youth Forum.*

  • The top two teams (one international and one US) from the Global Debates Spring 2011 Campaign get a 50% fee waiver to the 2011 IDEA Youth Forum.*

  • The top two US teams and top two international teams in the final Global Debates ranking will receive a 100% participation fee waiver and travel to the Youth Forum 2011 (economy class - participants arrange and pay for their own visas and cover any other expenses)*

*note: the prize will be awarded to a team composed of one coach/teacher and three debaters; one school cannot win more than one of these prizes; of the international teams, only one school per country can win one of these prizes.
 
Deadlines
 
1. Register your team and prepare yourself with the toolkit. 
DEADLINE:
December 15. N.B. For the Global Challenge you need to be registered by November 15!
2. Host one or more public debates on this topic:
Nations of the world should increase protection of the economic and social rights of migrants.”
DEADLINE: Between October 1 and December 15.
DEADLINE: December 15.
 4. Upload the pictures and a Youtube video of your debate, as well as other points activities here. 
DEADLINE: December 15
 5. Do extra activities to earn more points.
PlayDecide game
Video PSAs
Participation of Elected Leaders
Service Projects
Press Coverage
Research Blog Posts
Score high on Global Challenge
 
Tips for debating migration
 from a Concept paper by Neill Harvey-Smith, former Chair, World Debating Council.
Right now, all over the world, millions of people are on the move. Scientists, academics and business people are making international transfers. The oppressed and war-weary are fleeing their homes. Rural people are flocking to cities. Inner-city dwellers are escaping to the suburbs. Some are making a temporary move, to work and save for their family; some are trafficked against their will; others are building a new life on the other side of the world.
The public debate about immigration tends to lump everyone in a pot marked “immigrants”. Each person has their own reasons for moving, and their own story to tell. In order to understand the dynamic forces at work, we need to group people together. At the beginning you might be baffled by terminology. There are a lot of terms out there to describe people’s varied migrant journeys, like step migration, chain migration, return migration or seasonal migration. Get comfortable with this language of migration then relate it back to everyday life.

Framing

 
Given all the different types of migration, and the time limitations of a debate, the golden rule is: clarity, not caricature. Ensure you delineate between people’s motivations and situations. Think carefully, because the tone of your language reveals as much as the content of your arguments.
 
Principles
 
Who gets to be where and why? It is easy to make lazy assumptions about the rights and wrongs of migration. Remember that, in debates, we are less interested in what the law says than what it should say. Be clear which social and economic rights you think are being denied to the particular group you are considering – and from where you believe those rights are derived.
 
Consequences
 
How will be the future be different? There is so much richness and possibility in debates on migration. One side sees the importance of protecting indigenous culture. The other calls that racism and argues multiculturalism is inevitable. One team calls for greater generosity in welcoming refugees. Another warns that the bonds of civil society will break if people no longer feel kinship with the fellow citizens. For some, an infusion of low-paid workers is the saviour of Europe’s sclerotic economy. To others, competition from outsiders is the source of defeatism and racism.
fontfontfontfont

The Big IDEA - join the debate!

 
 
In this issue...
 “Let’s start with some debating. Why not take part in the new online debates and try out the You’re The Judge competition?
 
You’ll need the practice, as I bring you news of how to win an expenses-paid trip to New York plus $10,000, as well as your chance to help reshape the global financial system. Time to brush up...”
 
  Neill Harvey-Smith, editor, The Big IDEA. 

 Competition - Debates of the week    
With our friends at Debatewise, we have set up some special Big IDEA debates just for you.
 
Two important upcoming dates in the UN calendar are October 1st, the International Day of Older Persons, and October 5th, World Teachers’ Day.
  

Inspired by these events, come and debate these motions:

Competition - You’re The Judge
 
Nobody got the right answer to last week’s teaser! My thanks to those who tried and a slap on the wrist to the rest of you. Here it is again, with my explanation.  
 

Q1: In a British Parliamentary debate, on This House Would Decriminalise Drugs, opening government defines the motion as “western countries should legalise all drugs”. Opening opposition challenges that definition, saying it is unfair because “decriminalise” and “legalise” don’t mean the same thing. Opening opposition takes the line that, rather than decriminalising drugs, governments should legalise drugs. In effect, both sides are arguing for the same policy.
 

A1: “While there is a difference between ‘decriminalise’ and ‘legalise’, it is a reasonable interpretation. The definition goes even further than the motion, which is the right side of the line on which to err.  Opposition are wrong to challenge it, and doubly wrong to argue the line that government should legalise drugs. The judge should accept the definition.”
 

And now this week’s problem on extensions. Please send your answer to nhsemail@gmail.com. Fame awaits the best response as it will be printed in the next Big IDEA.
 

Q2: In a British Parliamentary debate, the first speaker of the closing government team is making her speech. She spends several minutes rebutting the opening opposition, then makes two new arguments to further the proposition.
 

After the debate, a fellow adjudicator says you should penalise her for failing to make an extension. You are forced to admit that she did not use the word “extension”. On that basis, he wants to demote the team from first to second.
 

You’re the judge - what should you do? who is right? why?
 
Feature - Changing Minds

Academia de Dezbateri (The Debate Academy) put The Economist, The European Voice, and Foreign Policy editorials under intense scrutiny, testing what difference public debate can create in the attitudes of an audience.
 
80 students took part in two online debate rounds and over 5000 visitors took part on the website. After an online debating selection round, the remaining students learned how to depict errors in international journals editorials, one of the primary sources of public information.
 
In two public debates held in Bucharest, students paired with civil society representatives to argue on two motions :
  • New media empowers the citizens of a democracy
  • It is justified to invoke tradition in conflicts involving the violation/infringement of civil rights.
“I learnt how to recognize context, premises, the main arguments and, more than anything, to see the sophisms, to de-construct and to reply to them.” said student Maria Tereza Antica. “Now I pay more attention to the articles’ sources and structures and feel more comfortable knowing how to read them.”
  
Using a voting system similar to that of Parliament, the audience was asked to vote for/against the motion prior and post-debate, to see what difference the exercise had made. Under the slogan “in arguments we trust”, see what a true public exchange of ideas can do: here and here.
 
“This is just the beginning” says Raluca Bogdan, from ARDOR. “From October 2010 to June 2011, ARDOR will multiply this pilot program fourfold. Students from Timisoara, Iasi, Cluj and Bucharest will debate online, be trained in critical reading procedures and provoke public debates.”
 
Check out the next Big Idea for more about the craze for online debate - not just in Romania but all over the world.
 
“The Debate Academy” (www.academiadedezbateri.ro), in partnership with Policy Center for Roma and Minorities, was financed by the European Commission through Youth in Action.

Announcement - Bickel & Brewer Cup
 
 
Calling all international debate teams:
 
The Bickel & Brewer Foundation and New York University invite you to participate in the 10th annual International Public Policy Forum - the only competition that gives high school students across the globe the opportunity to participate in written and oral debates on issues of public policy!
 
The IPPF is a free competition for public and private school students. Students compete for more than $50,000 in awards and prizes, and the chance to be one of the final eight teams invited on an all-expenses-paid trip to IPPF Finals Weekend in New York City!
 
Registration for the 2010-11 IPPF is currently underway. To register, visit www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf.
 
The registration deadline is October 13. Then begin writing your qualifying round essay on the topic, "Resolved: NATO military operations in Afghanistan are not justified."  Essays can be written in the affirmative or the negative, and may be no more than 2,800 words in length.
 
Essays must be submitted to ippf@bickelbrewer.com by October 27.
 
The Essay Review Committee will select the top 32 teams. Those teams win cash prizes and immediately begin a single-elimination, written debate round. Teams volley papers back and forth via e-mail, with one team affirming the topic and the other negating it. Judges review the essays in the order they were received and vote for the winning team. This continues for several rounds until the final eight teams emerge.
 
The final eight teams win an all-expenses-paid trip to IPPF Finals Weekend in New York City for three students and two coaches. There, teams compete in oral debates in front of a prestigious panel of judges. The winning team takes home a $10,000 (USD) grand prize and the "Bickel & Brewer Cup".

Debate News's profile »

About


Twitter